In "This American Life" part I and part II it is clear that the speakers are addressing the various reforms that have taken place in education, and the need to change the schooling system cycle of having "good" schools and having "bad" schools. They say that the achievement gap between these types of schools is far to significant and that School integration a system that has been proven to work in the past is proven. But school systems have given up on that idea because it is believed they cannot get away from the identity that most good schools embody white people and integration of children from bad schools which are mostly black students involves the aspect of race. The comparison between the two school districts in which integration was and was not available shows the importance of developing a system that works and promotes growth for students through opportunity. This reminded me of the Kozol reading in which you have many impoverished and non-contributing members in society put together in one place and it provides no opportunity for growth. Most of the time this happens because it is a cycle as Kristof says where you start is a good indicator of where you will end up. This continuing cycle of "bad schools" is not going to stop unless action is taken such as integration. Fixing segregated schools is believed as what needs to be done because integration is an "access point" for race discussion which is not what needs to be bought up.
In Bob Herbert's Separate and Unequal he says that schools are no longer segregated in almost the "matter of law", but in fact still are because of poverty stricken areas, where housing opportunities are of less, and economic disparities are present. The separation of people and the inequality amongst people are what creates the unequal-ness on society on every level including education. He says it is important to help those students in "bad schools" and impoverished neighborhoods get more access to better education and opportunities.
Connections to other texts: Again I believe these weekly listening's and readings relate to kristof and kozol because kristof says that where you start is where you end which is true with Herbert's piece because children are born impoverished and cannot escape that because they are placed in an environment and atmosphere where there is no opportunity for growth.
Points to share/ Discuss: How can "integration" occur to present impoverished children in primarily "bad schools" an opportunity to learn and gain more of an advantage to take them to places they have never been before. Without bringing in the factor of race how can we works towards decreasing the achievement gap?